It's been almost a month since the racist, bigoted, hate-monger Paul Streitz announced that he's running for Senate and his cash on hand has gone from 80 dollars to alittle over awhopping fifteen hundred dollars!
Before the pro-immigrant wackos jump for joy, let's do the math. First, let's round Streitz cash on hand to 1,500 dollars. Now if each person donated 20 bucks to his cause, that would equal a whopping average of 75 people donating to Streitz's campaign and if people donated more cash, the number of people would drop
Simple math: 75 people X 20 dollars=1,500 dollars.
In other words, Strietz has 75 people (at best) donating to his campaign. To add insult to injury, Streitz proudly displays that 49 people donated to his campaign which is even more pathetic than my average number (look at the thermometer graphic on the right). Wow, I think a group of homeless people can collect double the amount in the same time period simply by collecting soda bottles. Where's all the love from your allies? I guess their to busy writing silly attack letters to the News-Times (which is free of charge)?
04.25.22 (RADIO): WSHU Latino group call on Connecticut lawmakers to open a Danbury charter school
06.03.22 (OP-ED): KUSHNER: "Career Academy ‘a great deal for Danbury"
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
The amended complaint states that plaintiffs sought to remedy the continued discriminatory and unauthorized enforcement of federal immigration laws against the Latino residents of the City of Danbury by Danbury's mayor and its police department.
Plaintiffs allege that the arrests violated their Fourth Amendment rights and the Connecticut Constitution because defendants conducted the arrests without valid warrants, in the absence of exigent circumstances, and without probable cause to believe that plaintiffs were engaged in unlawful activity. In addition, plaintiffs allege that defendants improperly stopped, detained, investigated, searched and arrested plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also allege that defendants violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights when they intentionally targeted plaintiffs, and arrested and detained them on the basis of their race, ethnicity and perceived national origin. Plaintiffs raise First Amendment, Due Process and tort claims.
Plaintiffs request declaratory relief, damages and attorneys fees.