Last week, the city council held an ad-hoc committee meeting that looked into the renewal of the parking license fees at the former location of the Boston Billiards Club.
With plans in the works for the Chuck E. Cheese and Buffalo Wild Wings franchise to move into the strip mall, the owners of the property approached the council to negotiate the terms of the parking fees agreement, as well as propose plans to increase the number of parking spaces by eliminating the area between the strip mall and airport that currently houses the Danbury horseshoe club.
I came to the meeting about 30 minutes after the start of the meeting.
When I arrived, the topic of conversation we the pricing of the parking fees. In the audio clip, councilman Ben Chianese expressed his concerns over the low amount of money the city of charging the property owner for the parking spaces.
The video picks up with councilman Joe Cavo defending the parking fees.
04.25.22 (RADIO): WSHU Latino group call on Connecticut lawmakers to open a Danbury charter school
06.03.22 (OP-ED): KUSHNER: "Career Academy ‘a great deal for Danbury"
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
The amended complaint states that plaintiffs sought to remedy the continued discriminatory and unauthorized enforcement of federal immigration laws against the Latino residents of the City of Danbury by Danbury's mayor and its police department.
Plaintiffs allege that the arrests violated their Fourth Amendment rights and the Connecticut Constitution because defendants conducted the arrests without valid warrants, in the absence of exigent circumstances, and without probable cause to believe that plaintiffs were engaged in unlawful activity. In addition, plaintiffs allege that defendants improperly stopped, detained, investigated, searched and arrested plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also allege that defendants violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights when they intentionally targeted plaintiffs, and arrested and detained them on the basis of their race, ethnicity and perceived national origin. Plaintiffs raise First Amendment, Due Process and tort claims.
Plaintiffs request declaratory relief, damages and attorneys fees.
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
