<xmp> <body> </xmp>

Another jaw dropping Murphy/Johnson debate

Tuesday, October 24, 2006
Time: 11:12 AM

Oh man, this is rich!

I attended the Nancy Johnson/Chris Murphy debate last night but due to a power outage at my house, I'm unable to upload the video highlights. Until I have everything uploaded, I'm not going to comment on anything in great detail as I rather wait till the video is online.

In short, Murphy won the debate just as he won the first one. For the life of me, I don't know what Nancy Johnson is thinking when she says No Child Left Behind is funded. Any teacher wil tell you nothing but bad things about the plan and after Johnson's first goof-up at the first debate, you would think she learned not to say something like that.

Same goes for her position on illegal wiretapping. Here again, Johnson distorted the facts behind the FISA law and Murphy nailed her on it. Grrr...I would love to go into detail but it's so much better with the video...

The News-Times did a write-up on the debate which missed several key moments. When I post on the debate, I'll break teh News-Times piece down and with the video footage I obtained, show you where they missed the story.

Sorry folks, I really wanted the video online now but some things are out of my control. I'll have my full roundup posted later.

...developing.

FYI: Fred Lucas, you're not Mark Davis and you don't work for channel 8. There was NO need for the senate question. This was the last debate and there were so many questions that you could have asked which are important to the people in the fifth district...a question about the U.S. senate race wasn't one of them.

UPDATE: Now this is how
you write a story. Unlike the News-Times piece which was WAY to general, the Hartford Courant does the right thing and focuses on the most important part of the debate: the medicare bill and how it effects seniors.

U.S. Rep. Nancy Johnson, R-Conn., believes her co-authorship of the Medicare prescription drug legislation is a plus with senior voters.

But her opponent, state Sen. Christopher Murphy, D-Southington, sees it as a political liability for Johnson and an advantage for him this election year.

With some seniors frustrated by the complexity of the new Medicare drug program and worried about uncovered expenses, Murphy and his supporters claim older voters are flocking to his candidacy and could make the difference in this closely watched 5th congressional district battle.

"They vote at 80 percent clips, whereas people my age are voting at 20 percent clips," said Murphy, 33. "I don't think it's inaccurate to say that seniors, in their level of dissatisfaction, could be pivotal."

About 13.8 percent of the 5th District is aged 65 years or older, according to 2000 U.S. Census Bureau data.


At the Courant article states (and the News-Tiems missed), seniors make up a HUGE portion of the voting population in the fifth district and if Nancy Johnson loses, it will be primairly because of the senior's outrage over the new Medicare prescription drug legislation she sponsored.

Grr...I sooo wanna get dig into the debate, break everything down, and fully explain why the Courant piece is better than the News-Times article but I just can't right now.

I promise to come back to this later.

posted by ctblogger at 11:12 AM | Permalink|

0 Comments:

Add a comment

© 2017 Hat City Blog | READ, WATCH, AND LEARN.
No part of the content or the blog may be reproduced without prior written permission.
PEOPLE-POWERED MEDIA.


trans_button

Lowest Gas Prices in Danbury
Danbury Gas Prices provided by GasBuddy.com


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License

make money online blogger templates

trans_button
Danbury City Charter
Danbury Code of Ordinances
Robert's Rules of Order

trans_button
DOWNLOAD AND ANALYZE MARK BOUGHTON'S ELECTION AND PAC FINANCE REPORTS

Danbury 2005 election results
Danbury 2007 election results
Danbury 2009 election results
Danbury 2011 election results
Danbury 2013 election results
Danbury 2015 election results
City of Danbury calendar

trans_button
The Mercurial
Danbury News Times
Danbury Patch
Danbury Daily Voice
Tribuna Newspaper
Danbury El Canillita
(Spanish edition)

Danbury El Canillita
(English translation)

Comunidade News
(Portuguese edition)

Comunidade News
(English translation)


trans_button
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.

The amended complaint states that plaintiffs sought to remedy the continued discriminatory and unauthorized enforcement of federal immigration laws against the Latino residents of the City of Danbury by Danbury's mayor and its police department.

Plaintiffs allege that the arrests violated their Fourth Amendment rights and the Connecticut Constitution because defendants conducted the arrests without valid warrants, in the absence of exigent circumstances, and without probable cause to believe that plaintiffs were engaged in unlawful activity. In addition, plaintiffs allege that defendants improperly stopped, detained, investigated, searched and arrested plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also allege that defendants violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights when they intentionally targeted plaintiffs, and arrested and detained them on the basis of their race, ethnicity and perceived national origin. Plaintiffs raise First Amendment, Due Process and tort claims.

Plaintiffs request declaratory relief, damages and attorneys fees.

CLICK HERE TO READ/DOWNLOAD MAYOR BOUGHTON'S DEPOSITION

CLICK HERE TO READ/DOWNLOAD MIKE McLACHLAN (then MAYOR CHIEF OF STAFF) DEPOSITION

Danbury Area Coalition for the Rights of Immigrants v.
U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security
3:06-cv-01992-RNC ( D. Conn. )

(02.25.08) Court docket

(10.24.07) Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Emergency Motion for Protective Order

(09.26.07) Press Release

(12.14.06) Complaint


Barrera v. Boughton, No. 07-01436
(D. Conn. filed Sept. 26, 2007)

(02.25.08) Court Docket

Amended complaint

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss State Law Claims

Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to Dismiss

Order on Motion to Dismiss

Defendants' Answer to Amended Complaint

NEW HAVEN REGISTER: Immigrant's 2006 arrest was flawed Danbury mayor testifies

(10.05.07 (VIDEO) Boughton mislead the public about Danbury's involvement in raid

(09.18.07) Yale Law Students expose Danbury involvement in raid

(12.14.06) VIDEO: Interview with Yale Law Students at FOI presser

(12.14.06) VIDEO: Danbury 11 FOI complaint media roundup

City Clerk Jean Natale standing next to skinhead sparks outrage

(10.03.06) VIDEO: Danbury 11 rally

(09.29.06) VIDEO: Danbury 11 case deepens

Word of raid spread across the country

(09/29/06) VIDEO: Danbury 11 protest news conference

(09/29/06) Immigrant newspaper "El Canillita" gives best account of ICE day labor raid at Kennedy Park




trans_button
trans_button


Dunkin Donuts logo