Still undecided in choosing between Nancy Johnson and Chris Murphy?
Well, after watching my footage of their last debate in Danbury, the choice will become crystal clear.
I've been following the various politican races across the state and besides the U.S. senate race, the 5th CD race has caught my attention the most. In short, Nancy "donut hole" Johnson is so far from reality that it scares me as she's run one of the worst campaigns in recent memory.
Here's the brief rundown of her meltdown:
1: Johnson whined about Chris Murphy attacking her in an ad that wasn't made by him. 2. Johnson makes an campaign ad in which she recreates a 9/11 victims funeral.
3. In an ad straight out of Battlestar Galatica, Johnson lies about Murphy's stand on wiretapping.
4. Gets the NRCC to flood my cellphone with a ridiculous amount of robocalls tha make outright claims about Murphy's record.
5. Johnson lies about Murphy voting record in an ad, admits to lying Murphy's record to the Hartford Courant, and makes the same lie in a new ad.
Oh, I could go on but you get the idea.
If that wasn't bad enough, I had to endure a hour of Johnson lying and deceiving the public at the last 5CD debate in Danbury (the things I do for my readers).
While you watch the video, please make sure your sitting down when you witness Johnson a) make the outrageous claim that No Child Left Behind is funded b) completely dodges a question (to the delight of Murphy), and c) attempt to explain her travels that were bought and paid for by lobbyists and ultimately c) treat the audience to an hour of pure b.s.
This is a textbook "out of touch" politician going by against someone who's probably one of the brightest politician who is leading the charge for change in the House of Represenatives.
04.25.22 (RADIO): WSHU Latino group call on Connecticut lawmakers to open a Danbury charter school
06.03.22 (OP-ED): KUSHNER: "Career Academy ‘a great deal for Danbury"
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
The amended complaint states that plaintiffs sought to remedy the continued discriminatory and unauthorized enforcement of federal immigration laws against the Latino residents of the City of Danbury by Danbury's mayor and its police department.
Plaintiffs allege that the arrests violated their Fourth Amendment rights and the Connecticut Constitution because defendants conducted the arrests without valid warrants, in the absence of exigent circumstances, and without probable cause to believe that plaintiffs were engaged in unlawful activity. In addition, plaintiffs allege that defendants improperly stopped, detained, investigated, searched and arrested plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also allege that defendants violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights when they intentionally targeted plaintiffs, and arrested and detained them on the basis of their race, ethnicity and perceived national origin. Plaintiffs raise First Amendment, Due Process and tort claims.
Plaintiffs request declaratory relief, damages and attorneys fees.
Still undecided in choosing between Nancy Johnson and Chris Murphy? 
Here's the brief rundown of her meltdown:
While you watch the video, please make sure your sitting down when you witness Johnson a) make the outrageous claim that No Child Left Behind is funded b) completely dodges a question (to the delight of Murphy), and c) attempt to explain her travels that were bought and paid for by lobbyists and ultimately c) treat the audience to an hour of pure b.s.
This is a textbook "out of touch" politician going by against someone who's probably one of the brightest politician who is leading the charge for change in the House of Represenatives.
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
