More development madness
The News-Times has an article on the new diner on North Street which is pissing everyone off.
I've been working on a video post detailing the history of this bizarre diner (legal put sneaky) as well as how projects like this can be avoided in the future. I've interviewed people who were on the Planning and Zoning board and they'll give you a better understanding why an area, which was designed for another purpose, turned into a diner which many believe makes no sense. I've also talked to several residents in that area and they'll tell you why they feel this place doesn't stand a chance in being successful.
It's times like this where I wished I'd finished updating the site. I could have posted this video a couple of weeks ago but blogger has been unstable for some time. In any event, here's what the News-Times had to say about this insane development.
A new diner under construction on Padanaram Road is causing concern for some drivers who question why the city would allow another restaurant in an area notorious for traffic congestion. Nearly 25,000 motorists drive on Padanaram Road between Hayestown Avenue and Golden Hill Road each weekday, according to city traffic statistics. That traffic volume makes it difficult for people like Marge Nebinger to get through the area without strife during her drive from New Fairfield to work in Danbury nearly every weekday. The diner, across from the North Street shopping center, is only going to add to the problem, Nebinger said. "I'm not trying to make waves. I just don't understand why they give approval to these things when it is just creating more problems," she said. The city's Planning Commission in March approved Elmer Palma's plans to build a diner called Elmer's. Palma's site plan was later revised and approved in November. Crews are building the nearly 3,500-square-foot diner, which will be open 24 hours a day, on about a half-acre of land. It will have 22 parking spots, and is expected to open at the end of February. Dennis Elpern, the city's planning director, said the site is properly zoned for a diner, and therefore, a diner can be built. "A pattern has been established. It's hard to go back," Elpern said. The diner is closer to the road than most establishments along Padanaram Road. It was able to be constructed with only a 3-foot setback from the property line because of special variances attached to the land that date back to 1999. The property was then owned by Ann's Place, an organization dedicated to helping people with cancer that is now located on Old Ridgebury Road. There ia a bit more to this story that the owner isn't telling the public that will better explain why something as stupid as this diner was able to exist in the first place. This story isn't as easy as a project that's properly zoned as the owner has you to believe and city hall could have placed safetyguards to stop something like this from happening in the first place.
...well get into that later.
For now, as a quick flashback, here's a short videoclip of the traffic on North Street during a typical weekday. The diner will be located in this area, down the street by McDonald's (just outside the range of this clip by about an 1/8 of a mile).
UPDATE: Oh look at how the apologists try to spin the story...too funny.
I've been alerted by a number of readers to excuses people are making regarding this story. It's taking everything I have to hold back simply because I've been working on this story for some time and as I stated before, I didn't post it yet due to the updating blogger is going through right now (the service is still somewhat unstable for old blogs that are still working under the old system).
I'll explain the
real story behind the land use from people who would know...individuals who were on the board at the time. Trust me, there is more to this story than the 1999 decision that the elephants in the room are now calling a bad ruling by Democrats.
There is a world of difference between approving a variance for a place that is to help people with cancer and a diner. When I present my presentation in full, you'll see EXACTLY how this diner can into existence, how it could have been prevented
AFTER 1999, and how sneaky developers who get away with idiotic projects like this can be stopped in the future.
Hat City Blog | READ, WATCH, AND LEARN.
No part of the content or the blog may be reproduced without prior written permission. PEOPLE-POWERED MEDIA.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License
INDEPENDENT PARTY OF DANBNRY DATABASE COMING SOON
CITY OF DANBURY VIDEO ARCHIVE (Dec 2012-present)
The Mercurial (RIP)
Danbury News Times
Danbury Patch
Danbury Hamlet Hub
Danbury Daily Voice
Tribuna Newspaper
CT News Junkie
CT Capitol Report
10.03.18 (PDF): "Approval of Danbury Prospect Charter School"
10.30.20 (HatCityBLOG VID) : Charter School discussion during 2020 interview with Julie Kushner
2018 (RADIO): WLAD "State Board of Ed signs off on Danbury charter school proposal"
08.20 (VID): CT-LEAD "Stand up for Education Justice" Rally
08.20.20 (OP-ED): KUSHNER: "Charter schools are not ‘magic bullet’ to improving Danbury schools"
09.13.20 (OP-ED): CHAPMAN Candidate for state Senate supports charter school for Danbury
01.15.21 (VID): CT-LEAD Danbury Prospect Charter School press conference
03.19.21 (OP-ED): CT MIRROR "Danbury leaders do not want a charter school"
04.01.21 (OP-ED): CT-LEAD: "Why did Sen. Kushner vote against us?"
05.06.21 (VID): Danbury rally to fully fund public schools
10.07.21 (VID): Danbury City-Wide PTO "Meet the Candidates" education forum
10.07.21 NEWSTIMES Danbury candidates quarrel over charter school, education funding
01.10.22 NEWSTIMES "New operator named for Danbury charter school: ‘I’m a huge advocate for parent choice’"
01.10.22 NEWSTIMES "Some Danbury Democrats ‘open minded’ about charter school after new, CT operator named"
01.21.22 (OP-ED): CT MIRROR "Lessons from Danbury: Ending the dual process for charter school approval"
02.09.22 NEWSTIMES "Proposed Danbury charter school won’t open in 2022, governor leaves funding out of budget"
02.18.22 NEWSTIMES: Danbury residents plead for charter school funds in 9-hour state budget hearing: ‘Just exhausted’
03.05.22 (LTE): Time has come for Danbury charter school
03.12.22 (OP-ED): TAYLOR "Why I am excited about the Danbury Charter School"
03.16.22 (LTE): "Why a Danbury Charter School?"
04.02.22 CT EXAMINER: "Crowding and a Lack of Options for Danbury Students, But No Agreement on Solutions"
04.04.22 (OP-ED): DCS "Danbury Charter School plans debut"
04.07.22 (PODCAST): (CEA) "SENATOR KUSHNER DISCUSSES POINTS OF OPTIMISM FOR DANBURY PUBLIC SCHOOLS"
04.18.22 (VID): CT-LEAD Protest press conference
04.25.22 (RADIO): WSHU Latino group call on Connecticut lawmakers to open a Danbury charter school
06.03.22 (OP-ED): KUSHNER: "Career Academy ‘a great deal for Danbury"
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
The amended complaint states that plaintiffs sought to remedy the continued discriminatory and unauthorized enforcement of federal immigration laws against the Latino residents of the City of Danbury by Danbury's mayor and its police department.
Plaintiffs allege that the arrests violated their Fourth Amendment rights and the Connecticut Constitution because defendants conducted the arrests without valid warrants, in the absence of exigent circumstances, and without probable cause to believe that plaintiffs were engaged in unlawful activity. In addition, plaintiffs allege that defendants improperly stopped, detained, investigated, searched and arrested plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also allege that defendants violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights when they intentionally targeted plaintiffs, and arrested and detained them on the basis of their race, ethnicity and perceived national origin. Plaintiffs raise First Amendment, Due Process and tort claims.
Plaintiffs request declaratory relief, damages and attorneys fees.
CLICK HERE TO READ/DOWNLOAD MAYOR BOUGHTON'S DEPOSITION CLICK HERE TO READ/DOWNLOAD MIKE McLACHLAN (then MAYOR CHIEF OF STAFF) DEPOSITION
Danbury Area Coalition for the Rights of Immigrants v. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security 3:06-cv-01992-RNC ( D. Conn. )
(02.25.08) Court docket
(10.24.07) Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Emergency Motion for Protective Order
(09.26.07) Press Release
(12.14.06) Complaint
Barrera v. Boughton, No. 07-01436 (D. Conn. filed Sept. 26, 2007)
(02.25.08) Court Docket
Amended complaint
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss State Law Claims
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
Order on Motion to Dismiss
Defendants' Answer to Amended Complaint
NEW HAVEN REGISTER: Immigrant's 2006 arrest was flawed Danbury mayor testifies
(10.05.07 (VIDEO) Boughton mislead the public about Danbury's involvement in raid
(09.18.07) Yale Law Students expose Danbury involvement in raid
(12.14.06) VIDEO: Interview with Yale Law Students at FOI presser
(12.14.06) VIDEO: Danbury 11 FOI complaint media roundup
City Clerk Jean Natale standing next to skinhead sparks outrage
(10.03.06) VIDEO: Danbury 11 rally
(09.29.06) VIDEO: Danbury 11 case deepens
Word of raid spread across the country
(09/29/06) VIDEO: Danbury 11 protest news conference
(09/29/06) Immigrant newspaper "El Canillita" gives best account of ICE day labor raid at Kennedy Park
Santos Family Story
VIDEO: Tereza Pereira's ordeal with ICE agents
VIDEO: Danbury Peace Coalition Immigration Forum (April 2006) featuring Mayor Boughton and Immigration attorney Philip Berns
VIDEO: 2007 Stop the Raids immigration forum at WCSU
2007: Community protest anti-immigration forum
A tribute to Hispanic Center Director and immigrant activist Maria Cinta Lowe