As anyone can see and hear, it was a setup by ctblogger. Also I did not call her she called the show telling the screener she was over eighteen. No rules have been broken, all within guidelines and approved. There is a nob called on off they put them on TVs. Ctblogger thank you for our ratings have gone up 30%.
For those who haven't seen the encounter in question, please view the following clip.
So lets get this straight:
• I made a fifteen year old girl call BigT's show.
• The BigT(urd) show has a "screener" that asks callers for their age.
• According to Bennett, no rules were broken in his conversation when he made a sexually explicit remark.
• The ratings on the BigT's Talk & Variety show have somehow increased BY 30 PERCENT due to my coverage.
• It's the 15 year-old caller's fault that Bennett used a sexually explicit remark about lesbians couples.
1. Your so-called "screener" never ask for anyone age.
2. I don't have to "set" you up. You have no problem putting your foot in your mouth without my help.
3. She called the show yet it was YOU who used the term "eating" which is inappropriate at any age.
4. There is a contract which Comcast requires you to sign and you choose to ignore.
5. Comcast does not keep ratings.
6. Your disgusting.
PLEASE call Public Access coordinator Dave King, request that he enforce the rules and guidelines of public access, demand that Bennett's contract be terminated, and cancel The BigT's Talk & Variety show for repeated programming conduct violations.
Dave King, Head Public Access Coordinator: Phone: 203-792-1265 Email: Dave_King@cable.comcast.com
Candiann_Roswell: Public Access Coordinator: Phone: 203-792-1265 Email: Candiann_Roswell2@cable.comcast.com
When emailing, please cc: hatcityblog@yahoo.com so we can place your message of outrage on the blog (privacy will be honored).
Remember, PUBLIC access is the PUBLIC'S channel so let Comcast know that the public has had enough of Tom Bennett's profane, indecent, and disgusting language on the PUBLIC'S airwaves.
04.25.22 (RADIO): WSHU Latino group call on Connecticut lawmakers to open a Danbury charter school
06.03.22 (OP-ED): KUSHNER: "Career Academy ‘a great deal for Danbury"
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
The amended complaint states that plaintiffs sought to remedy the continued discriminatory and unauthorized enforcement of federal immigration laws against the Latino residents of the City of Danbury by Danbury's mayor and its police department.
Plaintiffs allege that the arrests violated their Fourth Amendment rights and the Connecticut Constitution because defendants conducted the arrests without valid warrants, in the absence of exigent circumstances, and without probable cause to believe that plaintiffs were engaged in unlawful activity. In addition, plaintiffs allege that defendants improperly stopped, detained, investigated, searched and arrested plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also allege that defendants violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights when they intentionally targeted plaintiffs, and arrested and detained them on the basis of their race, ethnicity and perceived national origin. Plaintiffs raise First Amendment, Due Process and tort claims.
Plaintiffs request declaratory relief, damages and attorneys fees.
Tom Bennett must be losing it. That's the only conclusion I can come up with when I read his comment on YouTube to my video post where Bennett made a sexually explicit remark to a fifteen year old caller.
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
