You're not the "deer in headlights" but rather the person who think the followers of the deer in headlights are "very nice folks", the person behind the Republican caucus closing their meetings to the public, and the individual who allowed number one rubber-stamp Republican Pauline Basso to spew some of the most insane crap ever uttered from an elected official, which ultimately lowered the standard of quality of your show.
...at least you got the sidekick terminology correct.
I could go on but I think you get the point. In the future, when offering "your opinion," get the facts straight when quoting this site on your show.
Well, I hope this helps but if you need more clarification, I'll be more than happy to accommodate...I know how you local access hosts like all the online attention.
04.25.22 (RADIO): WSHU Latino group call on Connecticut lawmakers to open a Danbury charter school
06.03.22 (OP-ED): KUSHNER: "Career Academy ‘a great deal for Danbury"
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
The amended complaint states that plaintiffs sought to remedy the continued discriminatory and unauthorized enforcement of federal immigration laws against the Latino residents of the City of Danbury by Danbury's mayor and its police department.
Plaintiffs allege that the arrests violated their Fourth Amendment rights and the Connecticut Constitution because defendants conducted the arrests without valid warrants, in the absence of exigent circumstances, and without probable cause to believe that plaintiffs were engaged in unlawful activity. In addition, plaintiffs allege that defendants improperly stopped, detained, investigated, searched and arrested plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also allege that defendants violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights when they intentionally targeted plaintiffs, and arrested and detained them on the basis of their race, ethnicity and perceived national origin. Plaintiffs raise First Amendment, Due Process and tort claims.
Plaintiffs request declaratory relief, damages and attorneys fees.
Well, I hope this helps but if you need more clarification, I'll be more than happy to accommodate...I know how you local access hosts like all the online attention.
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
