You just don't know how to stop the political nonsense?
Let's review:
City Hall schedule
MON 12.24: Closed at noon TUE 12.25: Closed WED 12.26: Open for business THURS 12.27: COMMON COUNCIL AGENDA FOR JANUARY PASSED OUT TO MEMBERS. Agenda is not available online. FRI 12.28: Last day City Hall is open UNTIL NEXT WEDNESDAY
MON 12.31: Closed TUE 1.01.08: Closed WED 1.02.08: Democratic and Republican Common Council Caucus THURS 1.03.08: COMMON COUNCIL MEETING
Now, chew on that for a while...trust me, it will all make sense later.
...oh yeah, as of Saturday December 29, 2007, two days after the agenda was distributed to the members of the Common Council, the agenda is STILL NOT available online for viewing by the general public.
04.25.22 (RADIO): WSHU Latino group call on Connecticut lawmakers to open a Danbury charter school
06.03.22 (OP-ED): KUSHNER: "Career Academy ‘a great deal for Danbury"
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
The amended complaint states that plaintiffs sought to remedy the continued discriminatory and unauthorized enforcement of federal immigration laws against the Latino residents of the City of Danbury by Danbury's mayor and its police department.
Plaintiffs allege that the arrests violated their Fourth Amendment rights and the Connecticut Constitution because defendants conducted the arrests without valid warrants, in the absence of exigent circumstances, and without probable cause to believe that plaintiffs were engaged in unlawful activity. In addition, plaintiffs allege that defendants improperly stopped, detained, investigated, searched and arrested plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also allege that defendants violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights when they intentionally targeted plaintiffs, and arrested and detained them on the basis of their race, ethnicity and perceived national origin. Plaintiffs raise First Amendment, Due Process and tort claims.
Plaintiffs request declaratory relief, damages and attorneys fees.
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
