Elmer's Diner, of 22 Padanaram Rd., scored a 86 out of a possible 100 points during a reinspection. The eatery was cited for inadequate and improper handwashing by an employee, poor food handling practice, poor hygienic practice and inadequate sanitizer concentration. It was issued a closure warning and is awaiting reinspection.
Eateries are allowed reinspection after an initial inspection failure. If the eatery fails that reinspection, it is given a closure warning and inspected again. If the eatery then fails that inspection it is ordered to be closed by the city health director.
So let me get this straight.
A cook does a number two in the bathroom, uses "poor hygienic practice," and proceeds to make my Ruben sandwich...then, I place my life at risk by darting across the street because there are too few parking spots at the god-awful diner.
04.25.22 (RADIO): WSHU Latino group call on Connecticut lawmakers to open a Danbury charter school
06.03.22 (OP-ED): KUSHNER: "Career Academy ‘a great deal for Danbury"
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
The amended complaint states that plaintiffs sought to remedy the continued discriminatory and unauthorized enforcement of federal immigration laws against the Latino residents of the City of Danbury by Danbury's mayor and its police department.
Plaintiffs allege that the arrests violated their Fourth Amendment rights and the Connecticut Constitution because defendants conducted the arrests without valid warrants, in the absence of exigent circumstances, and without probable cause to believe that plaintiffs were engaged in unlawful activity. In addition, plaintiffs allege that defendants improperly stopped, detained, investigated, searched and arrested plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also allege that defendants violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights when they intentionally targeted plaintiffs, and arrested and detained them on the basis of their race, ethnicity and perceived national origin. Plaintiffs raise First Amendment, Due Process and tort claims.
Plaintiffs request declaratory relief, damages and attorneys fees.
If dealing with the parking situation at Elmer's Diner doesn't get you killed, then the people who handle the food will place you six feet under...
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
