<xmp> <body> </xmp>

Reading between the Cappiello lines

Tuesday, July 15, 2008
Time: 5:57 PM

The end-of-the quarter fund raising reports are in and reading between the lines of David Cappiello's report can make your head spin.

I'll try to explain Cappiello's mumble-jumble.

First, Cappiello's camp is going to report that they raked in 446K this quarter and they've already released a statement proclaiming that they had a GREAT quarter.

The numbers sounds good right? Well, not so fast...when you look closer at the numbers and actually break things down, it becomes very clear that Cappiello didn't have quite the breakout quarter that he's going to proclaim. You see, Cappiello has a rather complex money tree which requires a manual to understand.

Let's take it step by step.

Cappiello has two money trees, one is his campaign's account called
Committee to elect Cappiello for Congress. The other (where a MAJORITY of his contributions came from this quarter) is the Cappiello-Connecticut Victory 08, a joint fundraising account created by the Connecticut Republicans and the Cappiello camp.

When you look at BOTH accounts, you notice that the Cappiello-Connecticut Victory 08 account raised over 300,000 this quarter. This money came primarily from one source...the Bush-Kissinger taxpayer-funder fundraiser from earlier this year hosted by the ConnecticutGOP. You know, the fundraiser that cost guests a whopping 1,000 per head to attend (it was reported that the affair netted about 750,000).

Take the cash from the fundraiser out of the picture (aprox 300,000) and when you look at the campaign's report, you notice that the Cappiello campaign actually only raised $123K from direct contributions this quarter.

So, in the end, Cappiello numbers aren't really what they appear to be. That's not to say that Cappiello isn't in decent shape BUT when you hear Cappiello's spin, read between the lines and take a look at where his money actually came from.

I'll have more on this later...

UPDATE: Genghis over at CTLocalPolitics also did a breakdown of Cappiello's numbers.

posted by ctblogger at 5:57 PM | Permalink|

0 Comments:

Add a comment

© 2017 Hat City Blog | READ, WATCH, AND LEARN.
No part of the content or the blog may be reproduced without prior written permission.
PEOPLE-POWERED MEDIA.


trans_button

Lowest Gas Prices in Danbury
Danbury Gas Prices provided by GasBuddy.com


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License

make money online blogger templates

trans_button
Danbury City Charter
Danbury Code of Ordinances
Robert's Rules of Order

trans_button
DOWNLOAD AND ANALYZE MARK BOUGHTON'S ELECTION AND PAC FINANCE REPORTS

Danbury 2005 election results
Danbury 2007 election results
Danbury 2009 election results
Danbury 2011 election results
Danbury 2013 election results
Danbury 2015 election results
City of Danbury calendar

trans_button
The Mercurial
Danbury News Times
Danbury Patch
Danbury Daily Voice
Tribuna Newspaper
Danbury El Canillita
(Spanish edition)

Danbury El Canillita
(English translation)

Comunidade News
(Portuguese edition)

Comunidade News
(English translation)


trans_button
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.

The amended complaint states that plaintiffs sought to remedy the continued discriminatory and unauthorized enforcement of federal immigration laws against the Latino residents of the City of Danbury by Danbury's mayor and its police department.

Plaintiffs allege that the arrests violated their Fourth Amendment rights and the Connecticut Constitution because defendants conducted the arrests without valid warrants, in the absence of exigent circumstances, and without probable cause to believe that plaintiffs were engaged in unlawful activity. In addition, plaintiffs allege that defendants improperly stopped, detained, investigated, searched and arrested plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also allege that defendants violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights when they intentionally targeted plaintiffs, and arrested and detained them on the basis of their race, ethnicity and perceived national origin. Plaintiffs raise First Amendment, Due Process and tort claims.

Plaintiffs request declaratory relief, damages and attorneys fees.

CLICK HERE TO READ/DOWNLOAD MAYOR BOUGHTON'S DEPOSITION

CLICK HERE TO READ/DOWNLOAD MIKE McLACHLAN (then MAYOR CHIEF OF STAFF) DEPOSITION

Danbury Area Coalition for the Rights of Immigrants v.
U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security
3:06-cv-01992-RNC ( D. Conn. )

(02.25.08) Court docket

(10.24.07) Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Emergency Motion for Protective Order

(09.26.07) Press Release

(12.14.06) Complaint


Barrera v. Boughton, No. 07-01436
(D. Conn. filed Sept. 26, 2007)

(02.25.08) Court Docket

Amended complaint

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss State Law Claims

Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to Dismiss

Order on Motion to Dismiss

Defendants' Answer to Amended Complaint

NEW HAVEN REGISTER: Immigrant's 2006 arrest was flawed Danbury mayor testifies

(10.05.07 (VIDEO) Boughton mislead the public about Danbury's involvement in raid

(09.18.07) Yale Law Students expose Danbury involvement in raid

(12.14.06) VIDEO: Interview with Yale Law Students at FOI presser

(12.14.06) VIDEO: Danbury 11 FOI complaint media roundup

City Clerk Jean Natale standing next to skinhead sparks outrage

(10.03.06) VIDEO: Danbury 11 rally

(09.29.06) VIDEO: Danbury 11 case deepens

Word of raid spread across the country

(09/29/06) VIDEO: Danbury 11 protest news conference

(09/29/06) Immigrant newspaper "El Canillita" gives best account of ICE day labor raid at Kennedy Park




trans_button
trans_button


Dunkin Donuts logo