"Given the politically driven opposition to my appointment I feel it is in the best interest of the city to allow you to go in a different direction,"
Hey Mike, this isn't about politics...it's about you and the mayor GOING BACK ON YOUR WORD!
Lets go back to the editorials.
Here's a copy of the 12.29.09 editorial that calls Boughton and McLachlan out on going back on their word.
Here's a rebuttal editorial to Boughton's bitter response to Connelly's 12.29.09 piece (you know, the posting that ignores the central piece in the News-Times' editorial...that the he and McLachaln went back on their work).
But of course McLachlan blames the whole matter on partisan politics...although a BI-PARTISAN ad-hoc committee overwhelmingly approved his appointment.
Oh...if I had the time to do a full post on McLachlan's excuse for stepping down...I'll have to come back to it later. Until then, enjoy the letter.
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of day laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
