I guess in the world of the most racist/idiotic/incompetent City Clerk in the history of Danbury, desperate times call for desperate measures...
Get a laugh at this fundraising letter for Jean Natale.
Now, not withstanding that this letter was sent to people Jean thought were her friends at least 10 days (if not more) before she officially filed the necessary paperwork declaring herself as a candidate (ahem, can you say campaign law violation), the letter, is a joke.
Section 3-3 CITY CLERK. The City Clerk shall be the Clerk of the Council. The City Clerk shall keep for public inspection copies of every proposed ordinance and a record of all proceedings including all roll call votes. All records so kept shall be authenticated by such Clerk or the President of the Council or both. The Clerk shall be responsible for the publication of such notices of hearing and publication of ordinances as may be necessary and perform such other duties as the Council may determine. The Council may, at any time,appoint an Assistant Clerk or Clerks, who shall, in the absence or disability of the Clerk, perform all the duties of the Clerk, and all records and acts of said Assistant shall have the same validity as the records and acts of the Clerk.
As you can see, Natale's laughable letter clearly highlights why she doesn't deserve re-election.
The City Clerk is the CLERK OF THE COUNCIL not the CLERK OF THE MAYOR! Natale's letter to her so-called supporters has nothing to do with her job description...in fact, Natale brags about how she works closely with the mayor when in fact, working with the mayor has NOTHING to do with her job description.
...and lets not bring up the fact that she DOESN'T do her job!
Unfortunately, we have a City Clerk who's simply too stupid, racist, and arrogant to understand that she's doesn't work at the pleasure of the mayor.
When it comes to the frustration people (on BOTH sides of the political aisle) have with Jean Natale, I'll let the video tell the story.
04.25.22 (RADIO): WSHU Latino group call on Connecticut lawmakers to open a Danbury charter school
06.03.22 (OP-ED): KUSHNER: "Career Academy ‘a great deal for Danbury"
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
The amended complaint states that plaintiffs sought to remedy the continued discriminatory and unauthorized enforcement of federal immigration laws against the Latino residents of the City of Danbury by Danbury's mayor and its police department.
Plaintiffs allege that the arrests violated their Fourth Amendment rights and the Connecticut Constitution because defendants conducted the arrests without valid warrants, in the absence of exigent circumstances, and without probable cause to believe that plaintiffs were engaged in unlawful activity. In addition, plaintiffs allege that defendants improperly stopped, detained, investigated, searched and arrested plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also allege that defendants violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights when they intentionally targeted plaintiffs, and arrested and detained them on the basis of their race, ethnicity and perceived national origin. Plaintiffs raise First Amendment, Due Process and tort claims.
Plaintiffs request declaratory relief, damages and attorneys fees.
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
