Danbury's last honest man gets away with misleading the public again...
Notwithstanding the utter absurdity in the comments made by Danbury's last honest man during his appearance on the Today show (TRUST ME, I'll deal with the whopper of misleading statements Mark told the TODAY show at a later point), what's more laughable are the number of local GOP operatives Boughton planted in the segment.
Lets have some fun at the mayor's expense...
Here's snapshots of Boughton interacting with members of the public at Elmer's Diner..take note of the people labeled in red.
Now, since this site is read by many insiders, and although I already know the answers, would anyone like to take a stab and name the people Boughton is interacting with in the screenshots? Leave your answers in the comments and I'll post the results later...
04.25.22 (RADIO): WSHU Latino group call on Connecticut lawmakers to open a Danbury charter school
06.03.22 (OP-ED): KUSHNER: "Career Academy ‘a great deal for Danbury"
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
The amended complaint states that plaintiffs sought to remedy the continued discriminatory and unauthorized enforcement of federal immigration laws against the Latino residents of the City of Danbury by Danbury's mayor and its police department.
Plaintiffs allege that the arrests violated their Fourth Amendment rights and the Connecticut Constitution because defendants conducted the arrests without valid warrants, in the absence of exigent circumstances, and without probable cause to believe that plaintiffs were engaged in unlawful activity. In addition, plaintiffs allege that defendants improperly stopped, detained, investigated, searched and arrested plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also allege that defendants violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights when they intentionally targeted plaintiffs, and arrested and detained them on the basis of their race, ethnicity and perceived national origin. Plaintiffs raise First Amendment, Due Process and tort claims.
Plaintiffs request declaratory relief, damages and attorneys fees.
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
