cooljustice @MayorMark That's fair. 5 minutes ago via Echofon in reply to MayorMark
MayorMark @cooljustice Apologize? I guess we will have to agree to disagree. 22 minutes ago via TweetDeck in reply to cooljustice
cooljustice @MayorMark Where does the buck stop in Danbury? Do you deny that Danbury cop picked up workers in van? When will you apologize? 31 minutes ago via Echofon in reply to MayorMark
MayorMark @cooljustice Neither. about 2 hours ago via TweetDeck in reply to cooljustice
cooljustice @MayorMark U Deny Danbury Cop Drove Van To Jail Immigrant Workers? R U Lying Now, Did U Lie @ Deposition Or R Your Lips Moving? less than a minute ago via web in reply to MayorMark
MayorMark @cooljustice Nice try. Neither one of those are true. But, just keep repeating it. It's flattering. about 2 hours ago via TweetDeck in reply to cooljustice
@MayorMark U Deny Expressing Interest 2 GOP Members In 5th CD? Is that Like Denying Set-Up Raid By ICE Against Danbury Immigrant Workers? about 6 hours ago via web in reply to MayorMark
Boughton Not ‘So Sure' Re; 5th District Congressional Run He Has Been Chatting About http://twitter.com/MayorMark
MayorMark @cooljustice Don't be so sure of that.. about 19 hours ago via TweetDeck in reply to cooljustice
5th District Congressional Candidate On The Stump http://blog.ctnews.com/election2010/2010/11/05/boughton-calls-for-a-recanvass-in-gov-race/ 12:55 PM Nov 5th via web
You didn't LIE about the city's role in the Danbury 11 case? Really Mark?
Hey cocky guy, why don't you just release your VIDEO deposition in the Danbury 11 case and let the people decide if you're a no good, dishonest, racist, bigot.
04.25.22 (RADIO): WSHU Latino group call on Connecticut lawmakers to open a Danbury charter school
06.03.22 (OP-ED): KUSHNER: "Career Academy ‘a great deal for Danbury"
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
The amended complaint states that plaintiffs sought to remedy the continued discriminatory and unauthorized enforcement of federal immigration laws against the Latino residents of the City of Danbury by Danbury's mayor and its police department.
Plaintiffs allege that the arrests violated their Fourth Amendment rights and the Connecticut Constitution because defendants conducted the arrests without valid warrants, in the absence of exigent circumstances, and without probable cause to believe that plaintiffs were engaged in unlawful activity. In addition, plaintiffs allege that defendants improperly stopped, detained, investigated, searched and arrested plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also allege that defendants violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights when they intentionally targeted plaintiffs, and arrested and detained them on the basis of their race, ethnicity and perceived national origin. Plaintiffs raise First Amendment, Due Process and tort claims.
Plaintiffs request declaratory relief, damages and attorneys fees.
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
