<xmp> <body> </xmp>

Danbury Dems accuse Mayor Boughton of voter supression

Tuesday, September 10, 2013
Time: 9:54 AM

Well, if Mary Ann Doran/Danbury RTC/Mark Boughton's attempt to re-locate the sixth ward polling location from the easily accessible Park Ave School to the "middle of nowhere" Moose Lodge isn't another example of their ongoing effort to supress the vote and rig the election, then you haven't been paying attention.

Thankfully, the Danbury Democrats aren't staying silent on this nonsense.

Danbury Mark Mark Boughton, Republican candidate for Governor, claiming a record of inclusion and accessibility as Mayor that includes recent courting of Hispanic and other minority communities, is now behind a controversial move to relocate a local polling place to one that makes it substantially harder for people to vote. Boughton and Danbury Republicans want to move voting in Danbury’s 6th Ward from its current location, Park Avenue School, where people have voted for over forty years and which is a highly visible public school, located on a main road with public transportation, lighting, sidewalks and access from multiple directions, to a private hall operated by the local Moose Lodge and which is located on a road without proper lighting, sidewalks, has access from only a single intersection, has no access to public transportation and which is so remote, that even Gary Mattson, the administrator for the Moose Lodge recently said to the Danbury Patch: "We're a hidden entity out here. It is a bit out of the way for a polling place."

Critically, the NewsTimes editorial page, Danbury’s major daily newspaper, opposed the move with an editorial on Sunday, September 8, 2013. The paper’s opposition is shared by voters. During a wide spread canvas of voters in the Sixth Ward over this past weekend the response was overwhelmingly negative regarding the potential move. Well over a hundred voters, including Democrats, Republicans and unaffiliated voters, signed a petition opposing the move and asking that the City of Danbury leave their polling place where it is.

Republicans justifications are a moving target. The Republican Registrar of Voters claims it’s more centrally located; the Mayor says it’s about safety during construction at the school - despite that fact that this directly contradicts his previous statements that ongoing school renovations pose no safety risk to the elementary school children attending classes. “The Mayor’s claims about safety are absurd: if it’s not safe for voters, then the Mayor needs to explain why he allowed school to open and children to return to class at Park Avenue,” said Danbury Democratic Party Chairman Joseph DaSilva.

Sixth Ward Council members, Democrats Ben Chianese and Paul Rotello, questioning the logic and timing of the move, said, in a joint statement that “this fight is about the voters and residents of the 6th Ward maintaining their historic public polling location, not replacing it with a smaller, more distant and less safe social club on a dead-end road. The switch is bad for voters and their families. It simply makes no sense.”

“Despite the varied excuses the issue is simple: Park Avenue School better serves the majority of 6th Ward residents in a safe and effective way,” said City Council Democratic Leader Tom Saadi adding, “there is no legal or logistical requirement for a proposed move which seems to defy logic.”

The move is also opposed by local officials, community leaders and Danbury’s Democratic Registrar of Voters, Marge Gallo, who submitted a detailed letter to the City Council. Danbury’s Hispanic Community has also voiced opposition. During an interview with the Danbury Newstimes, Ingrid Alvarez-DiMarzo, executive director of the Multicultural Center of Greater Danbury, said that many minorities and working-class families live in the neighborhood surrounding Park Avenue because of its easy access to services by both walking and public transit. “It’s not just the Hispanics and Latinos who would be impacted, but also the elderly and the working-class families. I can tell you which buses go to Park Avenue, but there aren’t any buses going to the [Moose] lodge,” said DiMarzo.

posted by ctblogger at 9:54 AM | Permalink|


Add a comment

© 2017 Hat City Blog | READ, WATCH, AND LEARN.
No part of the content or the blog may be reproduced without prior written permission.


Lowest Gas Prices in Danbury
Danbury Gas Prices provided by GasBuddy.com

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License

make money online blogger templates

Danbury City Charter
Danbury Code of Ordinances
Robert's Rules of Order


Danbury 2005 election results
Danbury 2007 election results
Danbury 2009 election results
Danbury 2011 election results
Danbury 2013 election results
Danbury 2015 election results
City of Danbury calendar

The Mercurial
Danbury News Times
Danbury Patch
Danbury Daily Voice
Tribuna Newspaper
Danbury El Canillita
(Spanish edition)

Danbury El Canillita
(English translation)

Comunidade News
(Portuguese edition)

Comunidade News
(English translation)

On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.

The amended complaint states that plaintiffs sought to remedy the continued discriminatory and unauthorized enforcement of federal immigration laws against the Latino residents of the City of Danbury by Danbury's mayor and its police department.

Plaintiffs allege that the arrests violated their Fourth Amendment rights and the Connecticut Constitution because defendants conducted the arrests without valid warrants, in the absence of exigent circumstances, and without probable cause to believe that plaintiffs were engaged in unlawful activity. In addition, plaintiffs allege that defendants improperly stopped, detained, investigated, searched and arrested plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also allege that defendants violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights when they intentionally targeted plaintiffs, and arrested and detained them on the basis of their race, ethnicity and perceived national origin. Plaintiffs raise First Amendment, Due Process and tort claims.

Plaintiffs request declaratory relief, damages and attorneys fees.



Danbury Area Coalition for the Rights of Immigrants v.
U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security
3:06-cv-01992-RNC ( D. Conn. )

(02.25.08) Court docket

(10.24.07) Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Emergency Motion for Protective Order

(09.26.07) Press Release

(12.14.06) Complaint

Barrera v. Boughton, No. 07-01436
(D. Conn. filed Sept. 26, 2007)

(02.25.08) Court Docket

Amended complaint

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss State Law Claims

Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to Dismiss

Order on Motion to Dismiss

Defendants' Answer to Amended Complaint

NEW HAVEN REGISTER: Immigrant's 2006 arrest was flawed Danbury mayor testifies

(10.05.07 (VIDEO) Boughton mislead the public about Danbury's involvement in raid

(09.18.07) Yale Law Students expose Danbury involvement in raid

(12.14.06) VIDEO: Interview with Yale Law Students at FOI presser

(12.14.06) VIDEO: Danbury 11 FOI complaint media roundup

City Clerk Jean Natale standing next to skinhead sparks outrage

(10.03.06) VIDEO: Danbury 11 rally

(09.29.06) VIDEO: Danbury 11 case deepens

Word of raid spread across the country

(09/29/06) VIDEO: Danbury 11 protest news conference

(09/29/06) Immigrant newspaper "El Canillita" gives best account of ICE day labor raid at Kennedy Park


Dunkin Donuts logo