For the sake of his family and his family's paving business, Josh Stanley should step down as a candidate for State Rep in the 109th district before there is a full protest outside of American Paving Specialists LLC, on Cross Street.
I have the Twitter posts and there is NO WAY this clown should had EVER been considered a candidate for any office...makes you wonder if there is anyone in charge of vetting candidates over at the Danbury RTC or if their crop of candidates were so weak that they had no other choice but nominate this extremist.
These racist and disgusting posts were known to many since Josh's Twitter account (JMStanley03) had many followers.
There is NO WAY members of Josh's family (including his mother City Council member Coleen Stanley) did not know that these tweets exist...and Josh can try and delete his Tweets and scrub his Twitter account but trust me, he's WAY too late!
The News-Times only posted the tame posts...the full ugly will be seen soon...prepare to be outraged!
04.25.22 (RADIO): WSHU Latino group call on Connecticut lawmakers to open a Danbury charter school
06.03.22 (OP-ED): KUSHNER: "Career Academy ‘a great deal for Danbury"
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
The amended complaint states that plaintiffs sought to remedy the continued discriminatory and unauthorized enforcement of federal immigration laws against the Latino residents of the City of Danbury by Danbury's mayor and its police department.
Plaintiffs allege that the arrests violated their Fourth Amendment rights and the Connecticut Constitution because defendants conducted the arrests without valid warrants, in the absence of exigent circumstances, and without probable cause to believe that plaintiffs were engaged in unlawful activity. In addition, plaintiffs allege that defendants improperly stopped, detained, investigated, searched and arrested plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also allege that defendants violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights when they intentionally targeted plaintiffs, and arrested and detained them on the basis of their race, ethnicity and perceived national origin. Plaintiffs raise First Amendment, Due Process and tort claims.
Plaintiffs request declaratory relief, damages and attorneys fees.
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
