In honor of my ever-growing cynicism over this year's municipal election, here's a #TBT post of my July op-ed in the Tribuna Newspaper on the big losers in Danbury's election season (hint: it's the public whose concerns continue to be ignored).
After covering the last nine elections and listening to countless political sales pitches from endless candidates for office from both parties, my views on the local political cycle have grown more cynical. Quality-of-life concerns that have plagued this city for decades are routinely overlooked and not adequately addressed as property taxes and living costs in the state's seventh-largest city continue to rise.
The city streets I traveled as a college student in the early 1990s, as a commuter in the late 1990s, and as a father with two newborns in the 2000s still lack adequate sidewalks, requiring residents to risk their lives while traveling from point A to B.
Ask any nurse at Danbury Hospital who routinely deals with the ordeal of walking on Osborne Street or Sand Pit Road to Germantown, residents who risk their lives walking along sections of Federal Road, Mill Plain Road, North Street, or South Street, and the decades-old complaints about a lack of care when it comes to the well-being of pedestrians who travel the city streets will be identical.
Cyclists in Danbury are in worse shape than residents who walk the city streets. Compared to other communities in Greater Danbury, an emphasis on bicycle safety is virtually nonexistent throughout all seven wards of Danbury. The lack of broad curbs or bike lanes throughout the city makes commuting on bicycles in Danbury just as treacherous as walking on the same streets. As an avid cyclist, I routinely pack my bike in my car and travel to Brewster NY, where cycling their well-maintained trails doesn't require me to put lives at risk.
In short, residents who will be shocked upon viewing their upcoming property tax bill this month should DEMAND that their elected officials get serious about making streets throughout the ENTIRE city safer for residents whose commute doesn't involve driving in vehicles. There's simply no excuse for residents to endure decades of woefully inadequate roads for pedestrians and cyclists.
Quality-of-life problems in Danbury deserve more than political rhetoric and back-and-forth mudslinging from both political parties. As individuals who were raised in the city, Mayor Dean Esposito and Democratic mayoral candidate Roberto Alves should be aware of these long-standing quality-of-life concerns; therefore, residents deserve to hear a forward-viewing vision for Danbury, including realistic proposals that immediately address these concerns and move well beyond the city's recent transit-oriented development study.
Here's hoping that this election cycle will end my growing cynicism.
04.25.22 (RADIO): WSHU Latino group call on Connecticut lawmakers to open a Danbury charter school
06.03.22 (OP-ED): KUSHNER: "Career Academy ‘a great deal for Danbury"
On September 26, 2007, ten plaintiffs filed suit in response to an arrest of aday laborers at a public park in Danbury, Connecticut. Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 26, 2007.
The amended complaint states that plaintiffs sought to remedy the continued discriminatory and unauthorized enforcement of federal immigration laws against the Latino residents of the City of Danbury by Danbury's mayor and its police department.
Plaintiffs allege that the arrests violated their Fourth Amendment rights and the Connecticut Constitution because defendants conducted the arrests without valid warrants, in the absence of exigent circumstances, and without probable cause to believe that plaintiffs were engaged in unlawful activity. In addition, plaintiffs allege that defendants improperly stopped, detained, investigated, searched and arrested plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also allege that defendants violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights when they intentionally targeted plaintiffs, and arrested and detained them on the basis of their race, ethnicity and perceived national origin. Plaintiffs raise First Amendment, Due Process and tort claims.
Plaintiffs request declaratory relief, damages and attorneys fees.